USPTO serial 90089006
CODEX ON ALTHASH
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DIBLE, JONATHON I
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CODEX ON ALTHASH?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BENJAMIN SIGALL
BENJAMIN SIGALL MACMURRAY & SHUSTER, LLP6525 WEST CAMPUS OVALSUITE 210NEW ALBANY, OH 43054Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Cryptocurrency payment processing | ACTIVE | Jul 22, 2019 |
| 042 | (Based on Intent to Use) Electronic storage of cryptocurrency for others; Providing on-line non-downloadable computer software for use as a cryptocurrency wallet; Providing on-line non-downloadable software for generating cryptographic keys for receiving and spending cryptocurrency; Providing technology information in the field of cryptocurrency; Providing temporary use of non-downloadable web-based decentralized applications (DApps) for connecting developers with freelancers, coders, and other programmers for project opportunities, and to provide access to such individuals to VIP features enabled within the platforms by expenditure of HTML-coin based cryptocurrency; Technological consulting in the field of cryptocurrency | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Codex on Althash, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Codex on Althash, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CODEX ON ALTHASH
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 17, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 2, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2022 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Dec 13, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2022 | EPPA | TEAS POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 28, 2022 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 3, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 5, 2022 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 16, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 29, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 28, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 28, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 19, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 24, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |