USPTO serial 90090108
SPHERE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FALK, JONATHAN ROBERT
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - SENIOR ATTORNEY
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SPHERE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ANGELO J. BUFALINO
Angelo J. Bufalino VEDDER PRICE P.C.222 NORTH LASALLE STREET - 24TH FLOORCHICAGO, IL 60601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable mobile application software for providing information regarding the availability of mobility services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Real estate property management services for parking facilities; real estate management of parking facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 039 | Parking lot and mobility services in the nature of transportation of passengers between airports and parking facilities; providing real-time information concerning the availability of passenger ground transportation services; website providing information regarding the availability of passenger ground transportation services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing an online, non-downloadable technology software platform for mobility services for providing access to the operation, management and financial data of mobility service providers; providing a website featuring online non-downloadable dashboard software for providing access to the operation, management and financial data of mobility service providers; providing temporary use of a web-based user interactive software application for tracking, creating reports, and sending alerts, notifications, and statistical data for mobility related functions, information regarding mobility service providers, personnel at mobility service providers, and employee activities at mobility service providers, accessed via handheld, vehicle, and desk top devices | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 10, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 4, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 27, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 22, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 17, 2022 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 10, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2022 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 10, 2022 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2022 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 22, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Dec 18, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 18, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 7, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 2, 2020 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |