Drawing for AUTOCODE

USPTO serial 90090488

AUTOCODE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 616
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SCHUBERT, HEATHER L
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AUTOCODE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Vivek Vaidya

Vivek Vaidya Bend Law Group, P.C.2181 Greenwich StreetSan Francisco, CA 94123UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use as an online code editor; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use as an integrated development environment; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for use in providing cloud hosting and a library for API'sACTIVEFeb 12, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 4, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2023NREVNOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED—
Apr 25, 2023TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 25, 2023CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 25, 2023ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Apr 25, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Apr 25, 2023PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Apr 25, 2023APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 8, 2023TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2023PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2023TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 8, 2023EWAFTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS—
Apr 8, 2023ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 8, 2023REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2023MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 8, 2023ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 26, 2022GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 26, 2022GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 26, 2022CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Apr 5, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 23, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 23, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 21, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 2, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 6, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance