USPTO serial 90091317
AMARI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DUBOIS, SUSAN L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AMARI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ajay A. Jagtiani
Ajay A. Jagtiani MILES & STOCKBRIDGE P.C.1751 PINNACLE DRIVE, SUITE 1500TYSONS CORNER, VA 22102United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable and non-downloadable computer software using artificial intelligence for analysis of third-party data, pattern discovery, contextual prediction, predictive analytics, predictive modeling, object detection, computer vision, classification of third party data, data segmentation, regression, decision support and visualization; downloadable and non-downloadable computer software for object detection in image and video; downloadable and non-downloadable computer software for design and serving of artificial intelligence models, including deep learning and machine learning models; downloadable computer and non-downloadable operating programs and computer operating programs of artificial intelligence consisting of artificial intelligence computer software and computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design and development of computer software; scientific and technological services, namely, design, research and development services in the fields of artificial intelligence and machine learning; consulting services in the fields of artificial intelligence and machine learning; design and development of software and hardware for pattern recognition and object detection systems; design and development of software and hardware for data processing and analytics systems; design and development of software and hardware for artificial intelligence and machine learning models; computer technology consultancy services in the field of software development and computer modeling services in the fields of artificial intelligence technology solutions, machine learning solutions and software products for data analysis, pattern discovery, process automation, contextual prediction, predictive analytics, predictive modelling, object detection, computer vision, segmentation, regression, decision support and visualization; artificial intelligence based testing, analysis and evaluation of third-party data, pattern discovery, contextual prediction, predictive analytics, predictive modelling, object detection, computer vision, classification of third party data, data segmentation, regression, decision support and visualization; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in the field of data processing based on artificial intelligence and machine learning; platform as a service (PaaS) featuring computer software platforms for use in the field of analysis of third-party data, pattern discovery, contextual prediction, predictive analysis, predictive modelling, object detection and computer vision, classification of third party data, data segmentation and visualization; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software platforms in the field of software for data processing based on artificial intelligence and machine learning; software as a service (SaaS) featuring computer software platforms for analysis of third-party data, pattern discovery, contextual prediction, predictive analysis, predictive modelling, object detection and computer vision, classification of third party data, data segmentation and visualization | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 5, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 5, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 31, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 31, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2024 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 29, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 1, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 31, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 2, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 17, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 30, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 26, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 26, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 11, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 15, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 3, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 2, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |