USPTO serial 90092929
LASERTRACK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 22, 2022
- Examiner
- RIOS, SASHA BOSHART
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with LASERTRACK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Keith R. Obert
Keith R. Obert WARE, FRESSOLA, MAGUIRE & BARBER LLP755 MAIN STREET, BLDG. 5MONROE, CT 06468UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | inspection devices for locating and tracking gaming chips; electronic authenticity checking devices for gaming chips; electric lighting equipment for inspecting gaming chips; electric light sources for inspecting gaming chips; laser pointers for inspecting gaming chips; electronic testing devices for ascertaining the material composition of gaming chips; electronic pigment testing devices for gaming chips; electronic devices for scanning amount and quantity of gaming chips; electronic ID confirmation devices for gaming chips; Light emitting diodes (LEDs) emitting invisible light; laser pointers emitting invisible light; electronic inspection devices for gaming chips with lights emitting invisible light; penlights for inspecting gaming chips; penlights emitting invisible light for inspecting gaming chips | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Gaming chips; gaming chips with pigments that emit light in invisible light as a material; gaming chips with pigments that emit light under ultraviolet rays as a material; gaming chips with infrared emitting pigments as a material; gaming chips with ultraviolet security pigments as a material; gaming chips with infrared security pigments as a material; gaming chips with invisible security pigments as a material | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Angel Playing Cards Co., Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by ANGEL GROUP CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks owned by ANGEL GROUP CO., LTD.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named LASERTRACK
- Prosecution event R.SR explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2022 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Jan 20, 2022 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 18, 2022 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 21, 2021 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 7, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 6, 2021 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 30, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 12, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 12, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| May 19, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 25, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 25, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 24, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 3, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 7, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |