Drawing for ORTHOPLUS

USPTO serial 90093023

ORTHOPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORDOVA, RAUL
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ORTHOPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

MADELON LAPIDUS

MADELON LAPIDUS HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749ATTN TRADEMARK DOCKETINGDENVER, CO 80201

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
044Providing assistance in proactive medical care and aftercare medical planning for patients undergoing orthopedic surgeryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 19, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
May 16, 2022MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 26, 2022ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 26, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 14, 2022EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Dec 28, 2021EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Dec 28, 2021EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 28, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 28, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 28, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 2, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 1, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 1, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 3, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 3, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 24, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance