CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for SDX

USPTO serial 90095290

SDX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LEASER, ANDREW C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SDX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr., Esq.

Charles F. Reidelbach, Jr., Esq. HIGGS FLETCHER & MACK LLP401 WEST A STREET, SUITE 2600SAN DIEGO, CA 92101UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Business administration and management services related to toll roads, managed highway lanes, and similar transportation-related facilities; Business operation of toll roads, managed highway lanes, and similar transportation-related facilities for others; Provision of information in relation to the aforementioned servicesACTIVE—
036Highway toll collection services; Provision of information in relation to the aforementioned servicesACTIVE—
039Transportation services, namely, providing toll roads and managed highway lanes for others; provision of information in relation to the aforementioned servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 19, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 20, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
May 18, 2022EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 18, 2022EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 18, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 21, 2021EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Sep 17, 2021EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 17, 2021EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 17, 2021EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 18, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 23, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Mar 23, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 3, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Feb 13, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 9, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 9, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 5, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 28, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 4, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Sep 3, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Aug 8, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance