USPTO serial 90112651
AIRLIFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FITZSIMONS, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with AIRLIFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Delray Beach, FL
Delray Beach, FL
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
lainie e. parker
lainie e. parker LAINIE PARKER, ESQ.26 WOODYBROOK LANECROTON ON HUDSON, NY 10520UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable computer software for facilitating online retail transactions of consumer or business goods and services; blank digital or analogue recording and storage media for the identified services being electronic storage media; Calculating devices for the identified services, namely, data processors, microprocessors, word processors, processors being calculating machines, graphic processor units, system boards and processors; Computers and computer peripheral devices for the identified services; all of the foregoing not related to transportation or delivery services | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Computerized on-line ordering featuring consumer and household products and services; Sourcing of alternate sellers and alternate products, namely, combined strategic goods or services sourcing and cooperative purchasing for others, and facilitating financial transactions between buyers and sellers by providing buyers with information about sellers, goods, and/or services, and mediation and conclusion of commercial transactions for others; Providing consumer and business product recommendations; Reward programs, namely, arranging and conducting incentive reward programs to promote the sale of consumer and household products and services; Providing services for the purchasing of advertising space, namely, leasing or renting of advertising space on web based systems and applications; all of the foregoing not related to transportation or delivery services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Payment processing, namely, processing of credit card payments, money wiring services and electronic transfers of money; all of the foregoing not related to transportation or delivery services | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Telecommunications, namely, transfer of data by telecommunications networks; all of the foregoing not related to transportation or delivery services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Privacy and data protection, namely, electronic monitoring of personally identifying information to detect identity theft via the internet, and electronic monitoring of personally identifying information on website to prevent identity theft via the Internet; Enhancing website usability being website usability testing, website design consultancy, by tracking user activity and offering suggestions based on tracked user activity; crowdsourcing data collection and task completion, namely, compiling data for research purposes; all of the foregoing related only to social media and the sale of goods through e-commerce and not related to transportation or delivery services | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by AirLift LLC
- Other trademarks owned by AirLift LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named AIRLIFT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 2023 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 2, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 7, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 18, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 2, 2022 | FIXD | ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | ERRR | ON HOLD - ELECTRONIC RECORD REVIEW REQUIRED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2022 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2022 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 24, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 24, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 9, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 8, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |