USPTO serial 90114280
GREY GHOST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HACK, ANDREA R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 108 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GREY GHOST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael H. Smith
Michael H. Smith HALL ESTILL HARDWICK GABLE GOLDEN & NELSON, P.C.100 NORTH BROADWAY AVENUE, SUITE 2900OKLAHOMA CITY, OK 73102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware and recorded software for the operation of counter-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs) drone missile systems; recorded computer software for the detection, tracking, alerting and interdiction of drones and unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Military drones; Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs); Military drones, sold separately, for use as a component of counter-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs) drone missile systems for detection and neutralization of UAVs for security purposes; Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), sold separately, for use as a component of counter-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs) drone missile systems for detection and neutralization of UAVs for security purposes; Counter-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs) drone missile systems comprised of UAV drones and video cameras; Counter-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs) drone missile systems comprising of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), video cameras, radio frequency, acoustic, radar, and imagery sensors for the detection of UAVs, electronic apparatus for processing and evaluation of sensor data and drones, surface-to-surface missiles and smart surface-to-surface missiles for the neutralization of the detected UAVs | ACTIVE | — |
| 013 | Surface-to-surface missiles; Smart surface-to-surface missiles; ballistic and pyrotechnic missiles and smart surface-to-surface missiles, sold separately, for use as a component of counter-unmanned aerial vehicle (UAVs) drone missile systems for detection and neutralization of UAVs for security purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 27, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2023 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 27, 2023 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 16, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 15, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 31, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 31, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 16, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |