USPTO serial 90128982
VIVO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JENKINS JR, CHARLES L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VIVO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
NAZLY AILEEN BAYRAMOGLU
NAZLY AILEEN BAYRAMOGLU BAYRAMOGLU LAW OFFICES LLC1540 WEST WARM SPRINGS ROAD SUITE 100HENDERSON, NV 89014UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Design and development of multimedia products; technical research in the field of telecommunications; Scientific laboratory services; Research in the field of telecommunications technology; Industrial design; Design of mobile telephones; Packaging design; Computer software design; Computer programming; Updating of computer software; Maintenance of computer software; Computer system design; Installation of computer software; Recovery of computer data; Software as a service (SaaS) as providing service of web-based software, namely, software applications for playing music, playing games, engaging in online shopping, accessing and viewing travel guides, communicating with others, processing and transmitting images and/or videos, and taking, saving and storing photographs; Software development in the framework of software publishing; Platform as a service (PAAS) featuring computer software platforms that provides a platform allowing customers to develop, run, and manage applications; Off-site data backup; Cloud computing featuring software for use in database management, for use as a spreadsheet, for word processing; Unlocking of mobile phones; Data encryption services; Developing of driver and operating system software; Software design and development; Recovery of smartphone data; Updating of smart phone software; Smartphone software design; Providing search engines for the internet; Development of computer platforms; User authentication services using technology for e-commerce transactions; User authentication services using single sign-on technology for online software applications; Design and development of software in the field of mobile applications; Installation, maintenance and repair of cell phone related software; Design of telecommunications apparatus and equipment; Design and development of virtual reality software; Electronic data storage | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 22, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 22, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 17, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 15, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |