USPTO serial 90130406
RESPONSIBLE TECHNOLOGY LABEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Feb 25, 2025
- Examiner
- MOSCATI, JUSTIN RONALD
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 700 means the trademark is registered and active on the Principal Register. You have nationwide rights for the listed goods and services and may use ®. Section 8 maintenance is due between years five and six. Calendar Section 8 between years five and six, and consider trademark monitoring.
Need help with RESPONSIBLE TECHNOLOGY LABEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Park City, UT, US
Park City, UT, US
PARK CITY, UT, US
Park City, UT, US
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Shuo Che Chou
Shuo Che Chou SINORICA LLC DBA THOUGHTS TO PAPER20251 CENTURY BLVD, SUITE 140GERMANTOWN, MD 20874United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | business reporting services featuring a digital or printed reporting format to generate outputs of an organization's management processes around the use of artificial intelligence and machine learning; collection and summarization of information into computer databases about the data sets used by the organization for artificial intelligence and machine learning | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Testing, analysis, and evaluation of the knowledge, skills and abilities of others in the field of data science processes, evaluation of fairness, ethics, bias, accountability, transparency, artificial intelligence compliance, and responsibility of data science processes to determine conformity with certification standards; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of data science processes, evaluation of fairness, ethics, bias, accountability, transparency, artificial intelligence compliance and responsibility of data science processes to determine conformity with certification standards; Testing, analysis and evaluation of the goods and services of others to determine conformity with certification standards; Development of voluntary standards for data science processes, evaluation of fairness, ethics, bias, accountability, transparency, artificial intelligence compliance, and responsibility of data science processes; Testing, analysis, and evaluation of data science processes, evaluation of fairness, ethics, bias, accountability, transparency, artificial intelligence, and responsibility of data science processes to assure compliance with industry standards; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring online non-downloadable computer software platforms to document and manage the process of developing, deploying, and using artificial intelligence and machine learning, for generating a printed or digital label to evaluate the services of others in compliance with industry standards that the company is using these technologies in a fair, ethical, accountable, and transparent way; platform as a service (PAAS) featuring online non-downloadable computer software platforms to generate printed or digital labels with diagrams, summarizing the content of the data sets, data models, and the compliance procedures performed there on | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by So.Ai, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by So.Ai, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GUARDRAIL TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by So.Ai, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named RESPONSIBLE TECHNOLOGY LABEL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 16, 2026 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | NRCC | NOTICE OF REGISTRATION CONFIRMATION EMAILED | — |
| Feb 25, 2025 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 4, 2025 | SUNA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF STATEMENT OF USE E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 4, 2025 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 28, 2024 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2024 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 26, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 23, 2024 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2024 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 30, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 8, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 25, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 19, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 18, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 25, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 12, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 24, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |