USPTO serial 90135960
PURITY PREFERRED
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PURITY PREFERRED?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Adam D. Mandell
Adam D. Mandell MILLEN, WHITE, ZELANO & BRANIGAN, P.C.2200 CLARENDON BLVD., STE 1400ARLINGTON, VA 22201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | microneedle patches, namely, transdermal drug delivery patches sold without medication | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | pet leashes; collars for pets; harnesses for pets | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | bedding for pets, namely, beds for household pets | ACTIVE | — |
| 031 | Edible pet treats; consumable pet chews; pet food; cat litter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Purity Organic, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Purity Organic, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 031
- Similar marks named PURITY PREFERRED
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 5, 2022 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 5, 2022 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 3, 2022 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 8, 2022 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2022 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 16, 2022 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | GNCF | CONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING A FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 18, 2021 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Aug 3, 2021 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | DMCC | DATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2021 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 23, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 1, 2021 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 1, 2021 | ERTD | TEAS REQUEST TO DIVIDE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 22, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |