USPTO serial 90136600
SLOW FOOD SERVED FAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COHEN, ROBERT ANDREW
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SLOW FOOD SERVED FAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID P. JOHNSON
David P. Johnson WORKMAN NYDEGGER60 E. SOUTH TEMPLESUITE 1000SALT LAKE CITY, UT 84111Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 043 | Restaurant services; catering | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 14, 2025 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 29, 2023 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Nov 3, 2023 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jul 12, 2023 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2023 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 28, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 25, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jan 18, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jul 23, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 23, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 21, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jun 1, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 29, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 31, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 26, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 26, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |