USPTO serial 90136803
MENDMD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLIFFORD, JOANNE E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MENDMD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CAROLINE G. CHICOINE
CAROLINE G. CHICOINE HUSCH BLACKWELL LLP190 CARONDELET PLAZASTE 600SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | computer software services, namely, providing online, non-downloadable computer software used to allow care providers to access, enter and view patient health information at the point of care | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 23, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 22, 2025 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 8, 2025 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jun 23, 2025 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 2, 2025 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 1, 2025 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 16, 2024 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 23, 2024 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 23, 2024 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 18, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 17, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 15, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 14, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 23, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 5, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 7, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 7, 2022 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 12, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 26, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 17, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 16, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 7, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| May 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 27, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |