USPTO serial 90139946
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David S. Kerr
David S. Kerr BERG HILL GREENLEAF RUSCITTI LLP1712 PEARL ST.,BOULDER, CO 80302UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 004 | Oils infused with extracts, plant-based powders, or whole plant biomass for use in the manufacture of other products, namely for use in the manufacture of capsules, tinctures, and skin care products; Oils infused with extracts, plant-based powders, or whole plant biomass and also containing cannabidiol (CBD) derived solely from hemp with a delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol concentration of not more than 0.3 percent on a dry weight basis, all for use in the manufacture of capsules, tinctures, and skin care products | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2021 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| May 18, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 18, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 18, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 17, 2021 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 17, 2021 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 13, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2021 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 24, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 6, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 29, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |