USPTO serial 90141778
ELECTRO-MEDIA READYROOM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HAN, DAWN L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with ELECTRO-MEDIA READYROOM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KENNETH F. FLOREK
KENNETH F. FLOREK FLOREK & ENDRES PLLC552 SEVENTH AVENUE, SUITE 601NEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Technological consultation in the field of selecting suitable for their intended uses third-party commercial telecommunication equipment, network connectivity equipment, audio-visual equipment, teleconferencing equipment, audio-visual presentation equipment, and technical equipment for commercial conference rooms, meeting rooms, and offices; consulting in the field of industrial design and interior design of third-party commercial telecommunication equipment, network connectivity equipment, audio-visual equipment, teleconferencing equipment, audio-visual presentation equipment, and technical equipment for commercial conference rooms, meeting rooms, and offices | ABANDONED | Jul 31, 2021 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2022 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2022 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2021 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |