USPTO serial 90142681
CORE SPACES + DESIGN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BROWNE, LUCY E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 125 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CORE SPACES + DESIGN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
William K Nelson
William K Nelson Sierra IP Law, PCPost Office Box 5637Fresno, CA 93755-5637UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Dealerships in the field of commercial and governmental office furniture and equipment, classroom furnishings and equipment, healthcare furnishings and non-medical equipment, and hospitality furnishings and equipment, and related accessories; Procurement, namely, purchasing commercial and governmental office furniture and equipment, classroom furnishings and equipment, healthcare furnishings and non-medical equipment, and hospitality furnishings and equipment, and related accessories for others; Providing consumer product information for the purpose of selecting commercial and governmental office furniture and equipment, classroom furnishings and equipment, healthcare furnishings and non-medical equipment, and hospitality furnishings and equipment, and related accessories to meet the consumer's specifications; Providing purchase advisory and consulting services to consumers for the purchase of commercial and governmental office furniture and equipment, classroom furnishings and equipment, healthcare furnishings and non-medical equipment, and hospitality furnishings and equipment, and related accessories | ACTIVE | Jan 23, 2020 |
| 040 | Assembly of furniture for others; Assembly of office and industrial furniture, shelving and equipment for others | ACTIVE | Jan 23, 2020 |
| 042 | Interior design services including space planning, furniture selection, material and surface selection; Color analysis for purposes of interior design; Consultation in the field of ergonomics, namely, designing workplace facilities and equipment to optimize efficiency and safety; Interior design; Interior design consultation; Interior design services; Planning and layout design services for commercial, governmental, educational, healthcare and hospitality office spaces, work spaces, classroom spaces, waiting lounges facilities and break-room areas | ACTIVE | Jan 23, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2022 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jan 28, 2022 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2022 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 18, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 26, 2021 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | NAUD | REPORT UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Jul 29, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 29, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 12, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 1, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |