Drawing for ECOSSENTIAL

USPTO serial 90148901

ECOSSENTIAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GOLDEN, JAMES B
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ECOSSENTIAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tara Reedy Sliva

Tara Reedy Sliva DENTONS US LLPP.O. Box 1302CHICAGO, IL 60604UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Hair shampoo; hair conditioner; soap for hands, face and body; skin and body moisturizer; skin and body lotion; shaving preparations; body and hand cream; skin cleansing cream; bath gelACTIVE—
005Hand sanitizing preparations; hand sanitizing lotions; anti-bacterial soap; sanitizing wipes; moisturizing hand wash; antibacterial hand wash; personal protective equipment (PPE) kits consisting of hand sanitizing preparations, nitrile gloves, non-medical face mask, sanitizer wipesACTIVEAug 12, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 17, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 10, 2022EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED—
Mar 8, 2022EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Mar 8, 2022EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Mar 8, 2022EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 4, 2022TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2022ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 4, 2022REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 14, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 4, 2021ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Jun 24, 2021ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
May 25, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 25, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 5, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 16, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 15, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 15, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 15, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2021CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Apr 13, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2021EWORTEAS WITHDRAWAL AS DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVE RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 13, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 13, 2021COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Feb 8, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 8, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 6, 2020MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance