CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RHIOT

USPTO serial 90149977

RHIOT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GADSON, SHARI B.
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with RHIOT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Alleman

Mark D. Alleman ALLEMAN HALL CREASMAN & TUTTLE LLP900 SW 5TH AVE.SUITE 2300PORTLAND, OR 97204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and computer peripherals, namely, portable computing devices and wearable computing devices for use in the field of industrial process control and remote monitoring and command of field operations for emergency services and military applications; downloadable and recorded industrial process control software; downloadable and recorded computer programs using artificial intelligence for controlling industrial processes; compact ruggedized edge computing devices in the nature of automated process controllers comprised of logic based hardware used to monitor the status of industrial machinery that implement artificial intelligence models to control execution of industrial processes by industrial automation equipment and electrical connectors and wiring harnesses structurally connected thereto, all the foregoing sold as a unitACTIVE—
042Design and development of computer hardware and software, namely, portable computing devices and wearable computing devices for use in the field of industrial process control and remote monitorying and command of field operations for emergency services and military applications, and software for such portable computing devicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 27, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 27, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 16, 2022ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 23, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 28, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Sep 28, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 8, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Aug 26, 2021PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 26, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 26, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 19, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 18, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 18, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 21, 2020GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2020GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2020CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2020DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 5, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 3, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance