Drawing for ARM SYSTEMREADY CERTIFIED

USPTO serial 90151302

ARM SYSTEMREADY CERTIFIED

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
β€”
Examiner
BUONGIORNO, CHRISTOPHER L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ARM SYSTEMREADY CERTIFIED?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robin C. Vance

Robin C. Vance McGuireWoods LLP800 East Canal StreetGateway PlazaRichmond, VA 23219

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Downloadable electronic publications in the nature of electronic test certificates for certifying that the architecture of computer hardware and software systems comply with a specific set of hardware and firmware standards for operational purposesACTIVEβ€”
042Testing, analyzing, and evaluating specific instruction set architecture implementations of computer hardware and computer software to determine conformity with certification standards; development of voluntary standards for the security of computer instruction set architectures, computer hardware and computer software for compliant computer systemsACTIVEβ€”
045Regulatory compliance consulting services relating to specific instruction set architecture implementations of computer hardware and computer software for complaint computer systemsACTIVEβ€”

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited Β§2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2025MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 1, 2025ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 22, 2025EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDβ€”
Apr 22, 2025EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTEDβ€”
Apr 21, 2025AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGALβ€”
Jan 27, 2025EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILEDβ€”
Jan 27, 2025EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 13, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVEDβ€”
Nov 13, 2024ECDRTEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESSβ€”
Nov 13, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action β€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 13, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVEDβ€”
Jul 26, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDβ€”
Jul 26, 2024EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTEDβ€”
Jul 26, 2024EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILEDβ€”
Jul 26, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 30, 2024EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDβ€”
Jan 26, 2024EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTEDβ€”
Jan 26, 2024EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILEDβ€”
Jan 26, 2024EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDβ€”
Jul 26, 2023EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTEDβ€”
Jul 26, 2023EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILEDβ€”
Jul 26, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2023EXRANOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILEDβ€”
Jan 26, 2023EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTEDβ€”
Jan 26, 2023EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILEDβ€”
Jan 26, 2023EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 26, 2022NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline β€” usually six months from the notice date.
May 31, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILEDβ€”
May 31, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 11, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILEDβ€”
Apr 27, 2022EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATEDβ€”
Apr 27, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTERβ€”
Apr 27, 2022XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTEREDβ€”
Apr 27, 2022GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDβ€”
Apr 27, 2022GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILEDβ€”
Apr 27, 2022CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTENβ€”
Apr 13, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEYβ€”
Feb 8, 2022GEA1NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILEDβ€”
Feb 8, 2022GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILEDβ€”
Feb 8, 2022CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETEDβ€”
Jan 27, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTEREDβ€”
Jan 27, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEβ€”
Jan 25, 2022ALIEASSIGNED TO LIEβ€”
Jan 20, 2022ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVEDβ€”
Jan 20, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTEDβ€”
Jan 20, 2022JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEYβ€”
Jan 20, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTABβ€”
Jul 20, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILEDβ€”
Jul 20, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 20, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 15, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTEREDβ€”
Jul 14, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICEβ€”
Jul 14, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action β€” typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 14, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 14, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 6, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINERβ€”
Oct 7, 2020MDSMNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILEDβ€”
Oct 6, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTEREDβ€”
Sep 4, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTEREDβ€”

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance