USPTO serial 90151474
EZMAX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DONINGER, CHRISTOPHER G
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with EZMAX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory B. Coy
Gregory B. Coy TAFT STETTINIUS & HOLLISTER LLPONE INDIANA SQUARESUITE 3500INDIANAPOLIS, IN 46204-2023Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable accounting software; downloadable computer software for electronic document management; downloadable electronic signature software; downloadable computer software for real estate agencies management; downloadable computer software for assisting real estate agents and brokers in the performance of their duties; downloadable computer software for database management specifically conceived to work with touch screens; downloadable computer software specifically conceived to work with touch screens for the analysis and collection of statistical production of real estate agencies | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Strategic business analysis, namely, strategic business data analysis, strategic business management analysis, business analysis and business strategic planning services in the technology industry in real estate; business administration assistance; business appraisals and evaluations in business matters; business management consultancy services; advisory services relating to business management; placement of staff; personnel management assistance services; employment outplacement services | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Vocational education in the field of real estate and training services in the field of real estate | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for accounting, electronic document management, electronic signatures, and real estate agencies management; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for assisting real estate agents and brokers in the performance of their duties; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for database management, namely, conceived to work with touch screens, for working with touch screens for the analysis and collection of statistical production of real estate agencies | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 9, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Nov 9, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 7, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 6, 2026 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 6, 2026 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 11, 2026 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 11, 2026 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 9, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 23, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 23, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 9, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 9, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 9, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 8, 2025 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 7, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 31, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 2, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 25, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 21, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 17, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 14, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2021 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 3, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| May 21, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 20, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 7, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 6, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 4, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |