USPTO serial 90154048
IO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STURMAN, JOSHUA M
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with IO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MINDI M. RICHTER
MINDI M. RICHTER SHUMAKER, LOOP & KENDRICK, LLP101 E. KENNEDY BOULEVARD, SUITE 2800TAMPA, FL 33602UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Personnel recruitment and placement services; recruitment consultancy for lawyers; recruitment consultancy for legal secretaries; recruitment consultancy services; recruitment consultancy services in the financial services field; recruitment of airline personnel; recruitment of airport ground staff; recruitment of computer programming staff; recruitment of executive staff; recruitment of flight personnel; recruitment of high-level management personnel; recruitment of temporary personnel; recruitment of temporary technical personnel; recruitment services for sales and marketing personnel; advisory services relating to personnel recruitment; recruitment and placement of staff; personnel recruitment consultancy for businesses; consultancy and advisory services relating to personnel recruitment; consultancy of personnel recruitment; consultancy relating to personnel recruitment; dissemination of information relating to the recruitment of graduates as personnel; employment recruiting services; executive recruitment services; human resources management and recruitment services; interviewing individuals for the purpose of personnel recruitment; providing personnel management advice relating to the recruitment of staff; office support staff recruitment services; permanent staff recruitment; personality testing for business recruitment purposes; personnel placement; personnel recruitment agency services; personnel recruitment consultancy; personnel recruitment services and employment agencies; professional recruitment services; providing information relating to employment recruitment; providing information relating to personnel recruitment; providing personnel recruitment information via a global computer network; provision of advice relating to the recruitment of graduates as personnel; provision of information relating to personnel recruitment; staff recruitment; staff recruitment consultancy services; staff recruitment services | ACTIVE | May 1, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 15, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 15, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 2, 2022 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Sep 1, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 15, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 26, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 26, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 29, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 27, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 27, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 8, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 15, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 15, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 7, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 8, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 5, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |