USPTO serial 90160533
CARDSYNC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NKOJO, RHODA K
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CARDSYNC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven A. Richards
STEVEN A. RICHARDS REESE RICHARDS, PLLC1275 E. FORT UNION BLVD.SUITE 115COTTONWOOD HEIGHTS, UT 84047Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Credit card and debit card account updater services, namely, automated credit card and debit card account information update services that allow online and brick and mortar merchants to securely receive updated credit card and debit card account information of their customers due to lost, stolen or renewed credit cards and debit cards, and due to credit card and debit card expiration date changes, and due to cancelled or closed credit card and debit card accounts; Credit card and debit card account updater services, namely, automatic and secure provision of credit card and debit card account information updates to online and brick and mortar merchants to ensure that their recurring and credentialed payment transactions successfully settle without the need to contact the cardholder for updated account information | ACTIVE | Jan 27, 2020 |
| 042 | Application service provider (ASP) that enables online and brick and mortar merchants to securely and automatically inquire and receive credit card and debit card account information updates from card issuers to ensure that their recurring and credentialed payment transactions successfully settle without the need to contact the cardholder for updated account information; Application service provider (ASP) that automatically and securely procures and provides updates to online and brick and mortar merchants from credit card and debit card issuers of changes to their customers' account information resulting from lost, stolen, or renewed credit cards and debit cards, and due to credit card and debit card expiration date changes, and due to cancelled or closed credit card and debit card accounts; Application service provider (ASP) that automates the payment industry's mandatory requirements for merchant enrollment, merchant service agreements, card holder data sorting, routing by card brands and card issuers, reporting, and payment card industry (PCI) compliance, and that provides brick and mortar and online merchants and software and technology companies that store PCI Level 1 data the ability to securely send and receive encrypted card data inquiries and updates from card issuers worldwide | ACTIVE | Jan 27, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 3, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 2, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 9, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |