USPTO serial 90162191
SAGE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DETMER, CAROLYN ROSE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SAGE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Alexandria NSW, AU
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lindsay B. Allen
Lindsay B. Allen Perkins Coie LLPP.O. Box 2608Seattle, WA 98111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | Aerated beverage making machines; Beverage processing machines; Bottle capping machines for food and beverages; Bottle filling machines; Bread cutting machines; Can openers, electric; Coffee extracting machines; Components for machines and machine tools, grinding machines, food processing machines; Compressors as parts of machines, motors and engines; Compressors for dehumidifying machines; Cutting machines; Dish washing machines; Dough kneading machines for household purposes; Egg brooders; Electric bag sealers; Electric brooms; Electric can openers; Electric cherry pit removing machines; Electric coffee grinders; Electric egg beaters; Electric flour sifters; Electric food blenders; Electric food choppers; Electric food grinders; Electric food preparation apparatus, namely, tumblers for marinating food; Electric food processors; Electric fruit peelers; Electric fruit presses; Electric fruit squeezers for household purposes; Electric garlic peeling machines; Electric graters; Electric ice crushers; Electric ice crushing machines; Electric juice extractors; Electric juicers; Electric knife sharpeners; Electric knives; Electric meat grinders; Electric milk frothers; Electric mixers, not handheld; Electric pasta making machines; Electric pepper mills; Electric pizza cutters; Electric salt mills; Electric scissors; Electric spiral slicers; Electric vacuum food sealers for household purposes; Electric vegetable peelers; Electric whisks for household purposes; Electrical coffee grinders; Electrical juice extractors for fruit; Electrical squeezers for fruit and vegetable; Electrically-powered kitchen appliance for dicing, mincing, slicing and chopping food; Food processors, electric; Fruit core removing machines; Fruit presses, electric, for household purposes; Fruit washing machines; Grating machines for vegetables; Juice extractors, electric; Kitchen machines, namely, electric standing mixers; Machines for making beverages from water; Machines for making carbonated beverages; Meat and food grinder attachments for electric mixers for household use; Miso making machines; Multi-purpose steam cleaners; Multi-purpose, electric countertop food preparation apparatus, namely, a combination meat tenderizer and marinator, for household use; Non-aerated beverage making machines; Packaging machines for food; Pasta making machines, electric; Pepper mills, other than hand-operated; Power-operated coffee grinders; Salt and pepper mills, other than hand-operated; Sieves being machines; Soda-pop making machines; Tea processing machines; Vacuum cleaners for household purposes; Vegetable core removing machines; Vegetable grating machines; Vegetable spiralizers, electric; Wet-dry vacuums; Whisks, electric, for household purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 22, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 22, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 19, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 31, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| May 31, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 31, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 20, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 5, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |