USPTO serial 90162759
DR.G
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 641Office Action
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCCARTHY, JOSEPH PATRICK
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 127
What this means
The USPTO has issued an Office Action on this application. A response is typically required before the deadline, or the application can be abandoned.
Need help with DR.G?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Office Action, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GOWOONSESANG COSMETICS CO., LTD.
Seongnam, Gyeonggi-do, KR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward D. Lanquist, Jr.
Edward D. Lanquist, Jr. Baker, Donelson, Bearman, Caldwell & Berkowitz, PC1600 West End Avenue, Suite 2000Nashville, TN 37203United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in beauty consultancy services with a chatbot provided on computers and mobile applications depicting an intelligent robot that can converse in text with users; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in chatting software for conversing from a computer in text with intelligent robot for mobile applications and computer devices; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in cosmetics consultancy services with a chatbot; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in beauty care consultancy services with a chatbot; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in make-up consultancy services with a chatbot; providing temporary use of online non-downloadable software for use in consultancy in the field of body and beauty care with a chatbot | ACTIVE | — |
| 044 | Consultation services relating to skin care; cosmetic services for the care of the skin; hygienic and beauty care for humans and animals; cosmetic analysis services for determining the most appropriate cosmetics to be used with a person's face shape and skin tone being cosmetic skin care services; nail art services; make-up consultation and application services; micropigmentation services; beauty and hair care services; consultation services relating to beauty care; beauty treatment services; beauty consultancy; hairdressing services; consultancy in the field of body and beauty care in the selection and use of cosmetics, fragrances, beauty aids, personal care products, and bath, body and beauty products; beauty salons and hairdressing salons; skin beauty consultancy services; cosmetic analysis; cosmetics consultancy services in the selection and use of cosmetics, fragrances, beauty aids, personal care products, and bath, body and beauty products; consultancy services relating to cosmetics in the selection and use of cosmetics, fragrances, beauty aids, personal care products, and bath, body and beauty products | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 30, 2026 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2026 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2026 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 1, 2026 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 28, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2025 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 18, 2025 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Aug 12, 2025 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2025 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Dec 29, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 25, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | EWAF | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED-FIRM RETAINS | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | ECDR | TEAS CHANGE OF DOMESTIC REPRESENTATIVES ADDRESS | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 14, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 4, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 23, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2020 | MDSC | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 11, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |