USPTO serial 90165058
APEX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AIKENS, RONALD E
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with APEX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David W. Nagle, Jr.
David W. Nagle, Jr. STITES & HARBISON, PLLC400 WEST MARKET ST.SUITE 1800LOUISVILLE, KY 40202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | body armor; hard plate personal body armor; protective vests reinforced with ballistic armor; protective helmets for use by military, law enforcement, detention centers, correctional facilities, and the like; hand-held protective shields for use by military, law enforcement, detention centers, correctional facilities, and the like | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2021 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 29, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 28, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 10, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 5, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |