USPTO serial 90165660
CAT SECURITY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MEIER, SHARON A
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CAT SECURITY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
GRANT R. CLAYTON
GRANT R. CLAYTON CLAYTON HOWARTH, P.C.P.O. BOX 1909SANDY, UT 84091UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | Vehicle services, namely installation of theft prevention devices in the nature of devices created to deter theft of catalytic converters; Vehicle repair and maintenance; providing information about the installation and maintenance of auto parts to others via a computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Custom manufacture of auto parts, namely manufacture of custom designed devices to be installed on the underside of vehicles to deter theft of catalytic converters | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Motor vehicle parts design services; namely design and manufacture of custom devices to be installed on the underside of vehicles to deter theft of catalytic converters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 29, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 29, 2024 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 29, 2024 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 10, 2024 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2024 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 10, 2024 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2024 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 23, 2022 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 12, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 23, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2021 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 27, 2021 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 27, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 24, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 13, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 13, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 6, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | PMSG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - MAKE SPECIAL - GRANTED | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Sep 15, 2020 | TPMS | TEAS PETITION TO DIRECTOR-MAKE SPECIAL-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |