USPTO serial 90166471
BEIYANG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 973
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOLANO, CARLITA JAYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEIYANG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Guangzhou, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jeffrey S. Firestone
275 7TH AVENUE FLOOR 7NEW YORK, NY 10001Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Accent lights for indoor use; Air filtering installations; Air purifying apparatus and machines; Aquarium filtration apparatus; Aquarium heaters; Aquarium lights; Diving lights; Electric egg boilers; Electric fans; Electric fans for personal use; Electric kettles; Electric torches for lighting; Fairy lights for festive decoration; Fans for air conditioning apparatus; Film stage lighting apparatus; Heating installations; Hot water heating installations; LED light assemblies for street lights, signs, commercial lighting, automobiles, buildings, and other architectural uses; Mixer faucets for water pipes; Electric toasters | ACTIVE | Sep 8, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 18, 2024 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| Dec 16, 2024 | KSAD | SUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW | — |
| Oct 26, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 21, 2024 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 6, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 6, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 10, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 9, 2023 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 6, 2022 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| May 8, 2022 | KSNS | NOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - ADMIN REVIEW | — |
| May 8, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 22, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 20, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2020 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2020 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 14, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |