Drawing for DIGOKO

USPTO serial 90170798

DIGOKO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 973
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KEAM, ALEX S
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DIGOKO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jeffrey S. Firestone

Jeffrey S. Firestone Shan Zhu Law Group, P.C.3511-B Farrington St.#335Flushing, NY 11354

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Baby lotion; Beauty masks; Cleansing creams; Cosmetic body scrubs for the face, feet, and hands; Cosmetic preparations for eyelashes; Cosmetics; Cotton swabs for cosmetic purposes; Essential oils; Hair shampoos and conditioners; Hand lotions; Lip glosses; Nail varnishes; Scouring liquids; Washing powder; Essential oils for aromatherapy useACTIVEMay 11, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 1, 2022KSNRNOTICE OF SUSPENSION EMAILED - PENDING SCO—
Aug 31, 2022KSADSUSPENDED PENDING ADMINISTRATIVE REVIEW—
Aug 25, 2022KSCOSHOW CAUSE ORDER—
Feb 11, 2022ISCOWITHDRAWN FROM ISSUE - COMM.OFFICE REQUEST—
Feb 8, 2022NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
Feb 8, 2022PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 19, 2022NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Jan 3, 2022CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 25, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 24, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 24, 2021ERFRTEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2021TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 24, 2021ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 24, 2021REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 24, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jun 24, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 24, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 23, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 22, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 22, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 21, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 21, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 19, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance