USPTO serial 90171167
EMBARK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RIEPEL, CHRISTINA MAXINE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 124 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EMBARK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
BRITT L. ANDERSON
Britt L. Anderson PERKINS COIE LLP3150 Porter Dr.Palo Alto, CA 94304United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Downloadable software, recorded firmware, and computer hardware for use in operating autonomous systems, devices, and machinery, namely, software, firmware, and hardware for autonomous vehicle monitoring and control, driver-assisted vehicle monitoring and control, human-machine interfaces for vehicles, vehicle subsystem monitoring and control, highway object detection, highway lane detection, semantic segmentation for vehicle control, highway multi-object tracking, decision-making for vehicle control, and highway navigation and mapping generation; downloadable software, namely, software used for highway navigation, steering, calibrating, direction, managing, coordinating, scheduling, booking, and dispatching of vehicles for land freight transportation; downloadable software used for coordinating freight transportation by truck and automated vehicles; downloadable software used for tracking, locating, and monitoring freight location transported by land; downloadable software used for coordinating the transport and delivery of goods by land; recorded computer software for managing freight transportation by truck and autonomous vehicles; recorded computer software for vehicle fleet management. | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing online software services, namely, providing non-downloadable software for transportation services, namely, coordinating, scheduling, booking, and dispatching of vehicles for land freight transportation for commercial shippers, highway trucking carriers, and highway trucking fleets; providing online software services, namely, cloud-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) services, for coordinating freight transportation by truck and automated vehicles for commercial shippers, highway trucking carriers, and highway trucking fleets; providing online software services, namely, cloud-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) services, for tracking, locating, and monitoring freight location transported by land; providing online software services, namely, cloud-based software-as-a-service (SaaS) services, for coordinating the transport and delivery of goods by land for commercial shippers, highway trucking carriers, and highway trucking fleets; research and development into autonomous vehicles | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2025 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 30, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 19, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 7, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 6, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| May 31, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 6, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 6, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 8, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 28, 2022 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2022 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 4, 2022 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 30, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 29, 2022 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 29, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 3, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 2, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 1, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 1, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 19, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |