USPTO serial 90172492
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Woodland Hills, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
A. Eric Bjorgum
A. Eric Bjorgum KARISH & BJORGUM, PC119 E. UNION STREET, SUITE BPASADENA, CA 91103UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, pants, hats and hoodies | ACTIVE | May 25, 2020 |
| 034 | Ashtrays, lighters for smokers, matches, oral vaporizers for smokers, smokers' oral vaporizer refill cartridges sold empty, electronic cigarettes, pouches for carrying electronic cigarettes, mouth pieces for electronic cigarettes, wicks for electronic cigarettes, cigarette rolling papers, cigarette papers, smoking pipes, tobacco water pipes, tobacco grinders, tobacco jars, hookahs, hookah accessories, namely, hoses, bowls, mouthpieces and bases | ACTIVE | May 25, 2020 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 4, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 21, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 21, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 12, 2021 | AAUA | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF AMENDMENT TO ALLEGE USE E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 11, 2020 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 11, 2020 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2020 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |