USPTO serial 90181989
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
RICHARD C. GILMORE
RICHARD C. GILMORE MASCHOFF BRENNAN GILMORE & ISRAELSEN111 South Main StreetSUITE 600Salt Lake City, UT 84111| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal structures for supporting solar panels, photovoltaic modules, and photovoltaic cells, namely, solar tracking systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 007 | Solar trackers, namely, driving motors, other than for land vehicles, for positioning of photovoltaic modules relative to the sun, and replacement parts therefor; Solar-tracking systems comprised of electric motors for machines for positioning of photovoltaic modules relative to the sun to maximize collection of solar energy; Solar-tracking systems consisting of machine motors and gears for automatically positioning of photovoltaic modules relative to the sun; Solar trackers for solar photovoltaic electric power generation systems comprised of motors, gears, and drives for orienting solar panels | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Photovoltaic systems in the nature of solar trackers comprised of automatic solar tracking systems that track the sun to maximize collection of solar energy; Downloadable computer software for controlling movement and positioning of solar trackers; Computer hardware and downloadable software for controlling movement and positioning of solar trackers; downloadable computer software and programs for controlling, regulating and monitoring of photovoltaic modules and solar trackers; Solar trackers in the nature of photovoltaic solar modules for production of electricity that track the sun in order to optimize the production of energy from the solar light; Solar-tracking systems comprised of automatic solar tracking sensors for automatically tracking the sun and positioning of photovoltaic modules relative to the sun | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Providing warranty services, namely, arranging for repair of solar tracking systems pursuant to service agreements | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Installation, maintenance, and repair of solar-tracking systems consisting of solar-tracking hardware; Installation and maintenance of photovoltaic installations including solar trackers; Construction of solar-tracking systems, namely, construction of solar power energy plants | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Design of solar photovoltaic systems including solar trackers; Drafting and development of photovoltaic systems including solar trackers; Engineering services in the field of solar-tracking systems; Quality evaluation for others in the field of maintenance, repair and installation of photovoltaic modules, solar panels, and solar trackers; Design of solar photovoltaic systems, namely, design and planning of solar-tracking systems; Installation of solar-tracking software systems; Installation, maintenance, and repair of solar-tracking software systems | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 26, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Aug 26, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 25, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Jun 28, 2024 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2024 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 15, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 6, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNS1 | NOTIFICATION OF SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNSF | SUBSEQUENT FINAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | CFRC | SUBSEQUENT FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2023 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 19, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 11, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 11, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 11, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 6, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 4, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 10, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 9, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 9, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 9, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 27, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 18, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |