USPTO serial 90184808
KIM CHI AVOCADO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 30, 2021
- Examiner
- MAHONEY, KATHERINE AILEEN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with KIM CHI AVOCADO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $399*
Plus Government fees of $325
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Santa Monica, CA
Santa Monica, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maurice B Pilosof
Maurice B Pilosof MAURICE B. PILOSOF, ESQ.PO BOX 691937WEST HOLLYWOOD, CA 90069UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | On-line journals, namely, blogs featuring recipes, recipe development, cooking, baking, beverages, cocktails, food preparation, food presentation, nutrition information, meal planning, and meal preparation; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable photographs in the field of recipes, recipe development, cooking, baking, beverages, cocktails, food preparation, food presentation, nutrition information, meal planning, and meal preparation; Providing a website featuring non-downloadable videos in the field of recipes, recipe development, cooking, baking, beverages, cocktails, food preparation, food presentation, nutrition information, meal planning, and meal preparation | ACTIVE | Nov 1, 2019 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2021 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Oct 27, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 21, 2021 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 1, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 2, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 26, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 29, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |