USPTO serial 90190204
ICOTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SCLEIDOROVICH, JOANNA YAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ICOTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MARTIN R. GEISSLER
Martin R. Geissler MUNCY, GEISSLER, OLDS & LOWE, P.C.4000 LEGATO ROADSUITE 310FAIRFAX, VA 22033Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal cable clips; Cable shield clamps of metal; Cable shield terminals of metal, namely, metal clamps; Cable clamping bars of metal; Strain relief cable devices for energy lines in the form of wiring of solid metal; Cable clamping bars of metal for cable bushings; Strain relief cable devices of metal for cables, namely, metal plates for securing cables to machines; Shield sheets for strain relief cable devices, namely, sheets of metal including those from alloy steel and titanium for shielding cables; Grounding and earthing straps of metal | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Single and multiple electrical contacts; Threaded electrical cable connectors for electric cables; Sheaths for electric cables; Clips of metal and energy guiding chains of plastic being electricity conduits; Cable bushings for inserting electric cables; Strain relief cable devices for energy lines of plastic, namely, electrical shielding spacers for cables and cable assemblies, for electric purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 017 | Protective plastic, shrink nylon or metal tubing for electrical wiring; Sealing and insulating materials of elastic plastic for housing bushes, in particular for cable bushings; Protective plastic, shrink nylon or metal cable tubing for electrical wiring; Cable bushings being insulators for cables | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Connecting, guiding, holding and fastening clips for cables and wires, of plastic | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2024 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Feb 1, 2024 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 21, 2023 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 4, 2023 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 11, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 8, 2023 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | XELG | APPLICATION EXTENSION GRANTED/RECEIPT PROVIDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2023 | XELR | APPLICATION EXTENSION TO RESPONSE PERIOD - RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Mar 8, 2023 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 8, 2023 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 23, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 20, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 21, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 4, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 5, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 4, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 4, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 26, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |