USPTO serial 90192571
ADVANCED FIBER TECHNOLOGY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SMITH, BRIDGETT G
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ADVANCED FIBER TECHNOLOGY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
STEVEN J NATAUPSKY
STEVEN J NATAUPSKY KNOBBE, MARTENS, OLSON & BEAR, LLP2040 MAIN STREET, 14TH FLOORIRVINE, CA 92614United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Medical catheters for use in the peripheral, coronary, and neuro vasculature; Component parts of medical catheters | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 5, 2024 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 5, 2024 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 29, 2023 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2023 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 4, 2023 | NOAM | NOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 9, 2023 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2023 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 19, 2023 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 7, 2023 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 3, 2023 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | RGIA | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - INADVERTENTLY ABANDONED | — |
| Mar 29, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 28, 2023 | EXPR | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL REVERSED | — |
| Nov 2, 2022 | RBFT | REPLY BRIEF FILED - CHECK TTAB FILES | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | GNSN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 10, 2022 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 11, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| May 11, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 18, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 15, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Sep 15, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 15, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 11, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 10, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 12, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 12, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |