USPTO serial 90192825
LEVEL UP YOUR LISTENING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- ADORNO SANTOS,LUZ M.
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 111
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with LEVEL UP YOUR LISTENING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew D. Delaney
Matthew D. Delaney FROST BROWN TODD LLC3300 GREAT AMERICAN TWR., 301 E. 4TH ST.CINCINNATI, OH 45202United StatesGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | Providing non-downloadable online computer games, electronic games and interactive games | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 2, 2026 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 2, 2026 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 16, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 16, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 21, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2025 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2025 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 8, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 20, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 17, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 18, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 6, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2021 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 4, 2021 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 30, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 27, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 2, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 28, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 22, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |