USPTO serial 90194267
TOENESY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 610
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, CHRISTOPHER J
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 128
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with TOENESY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Tianyu Ju
Tianyu Ju TIANYU LAW GROUP, INC.9660 flair dr ste 328El Monte, CA 91731UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Clinical thermometers; Electric massage appliances, namely, electric vibrating massager; Gloves for medical purposes; Masks for use by medical personnel; Massage apparatus; Medical apparatus and instruments for use in surgery; Orthopedic devices for diagnostic and therapeutic use; Sanitary masks for medical purposes; Sex toys; Surgical gowns; Surgical masks; Surgical sterile sheets; Suture materials; Ultraviolet lamps for medical purposes; Weight lifting machines for physical therapy | TERMINATED | Sep 14, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2021 | KNOT | NOTICE OF TERMINATION – EMAILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2021 | KONO | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS - NOTICE EMAILED | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | KBOC | TERMINATED AFTER SANCTIONS | — |
| Dec 10, 2021 | KOFS | ORDER FOR SANCTIONS | — |
| Dec 9, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 13, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 12, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 10, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 2, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 2, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2021 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2021 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 4, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 4, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 29, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 23, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |