Drawing for ROMSTAR

USPTO serial 90197612

ROMSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STEINPFAD, SARAH E
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 120 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROMSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

JOHN FALOLA

2807 ALLEN ST, STE 422DALLAS, TX 75204UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Arcade video game machines; Arcade-type electronic video games; Hand-held consoles for playing video gamesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 21, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 21, 2023MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 21, 2023DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 15, 2023ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 15, 2023EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 5, 2023EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Jan 26, 2022EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 26, 2022EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jul 22, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Jul 22, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 22, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 18, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 17, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 5, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 5, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 4, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 29, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 24, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance