USPTO serial 90200849
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Conservas y Congelados !Yaesta!, S.A.
Colonia La Escuadrilla, GT
Other trademarks owned by Conservas y Congelados !Yaesta!, S.A.
Conservas y Congelados !Yaesta!, S.A.
Colonia La Escuadrilla, GT
Other trademarks owned by Conservas y Congelados !Yaesta!, S.A.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
PAULO A. DE ALMEIDA
PAULO A. DE ALMEIDA WOLF, RIFKIN, SHAPIRO, SCHULMAN & RABKIN, LLP11400 W. OLYMPIC BLVD., 9TH FLOORLOS ANGELES, CA 90064UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Processed foods, namely, processed onions; processed baby coconut; pickled salad excluding macaroni, pasta and rice salads; processed figs; processed Spanish plum; processed green mango; Processed tejocote little apple; processed yellow cherries; cabbage salad Salvadorean style; processed fruits and vegetables, namely, date palm and baby corn; Processed edible flowers, namely, loroco flowers; processed Chiltepe hot pepper, hearts of palm, and jalapeno hot pepper; pickles; and frozen foods, namely, frozen yellow cherries, Spanish plum, sour guava, green mango, cashew fruit, whole zapote fruit, date palm, edible Chipilin plant leaves, and edible loroco flowers | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 2025 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 8, 2025 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2021 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2021 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 10, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 22, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 19, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 10, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 8, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 30, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 25, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |