USPTO serial 90203890
OMNIPLAST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 14, 2021
- Examiner
- MACDOUGALL, KIERRA RYNNE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with OMNIPLAST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $748*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Saint-Hubert, CA
Saint-Hubert, CA
Saint-Hubert, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Leonard Seidman
Leonard Seidman PINTO LEGAL99 PRINCE STREET, SUITE 601MONTREAL, QUEBEC, H3C2M7CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Plastic film, plastic film bags and plastic sheets for packaging; plastic envelopes for merchandise packaging; packaging material made of plastic and plastic substitutes, namely, plastic bags for packaging; package wrap materials, namely, plastic packaging wrap, plastic sheets, plastic films and plastic bags | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2002 |
| 042 | Packaging design | ACTIVE | Aug 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by OMNIPLAST INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OMNIPLAST INC.
- Other trademarks owned by OMNIPLAST INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named OMNIPLAST
- Prosecution event R.PR explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2021 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 28, 2021 | NPUB | OFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2021 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2021 | NONP | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 19, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 10, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 26, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |