CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for LITHION

USPTO serial 90204362

LITHION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 654
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PATEL, SHEENA KAPOOR
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 106

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LITHION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard N. Aronson

Howard N. Aronson Nolte Lackenbach SiegelOne Chase RoadScarsdale, NY 10583UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Components used to manufacture batteries, namely, lithium carbonate, nickel sulfate, cobalt sulfate, manganese sulfate, nickel, cobalt and manganese mixed sulfates, natural and artificial graphiteACTIVE—
040Custom manufacture of recycled battery components; recycling of lithium-ion batteries; providing information in the field of energy production and the treatment, transportation, logistics, recycling, transformation and incineration of waste; advisory and consultancy services in the field of energy production and the treatment, recycling, transformation and incineration of waste; technical consulting in the field of the destruction of solid and hazardous waste; provision of information, advice and consultancy in relation to the destruction of wasteACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 27, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 7, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jan 6, 2026RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 5, 2026RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Jul 4, 2025RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jun 30, 2025RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Dec 30, 2024RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Oct 8, 2024RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Nov 23, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Sep 6, 2023RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 10, 2023RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Dec 15, 2022RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
May 13, 2022GNS3NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2022GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
May 13, 2022CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Mar 24, 2022TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 24, 2022CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 24, 2022TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 27, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 27, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 17, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 17, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Aug 12, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 12, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 12, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 10, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 4, 2020MDSCNOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED—
Nov 3, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance