USPTO serial 90209949
IRIS STEP
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with IRIS STEP?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Skale
Andrew D. Skale MINTZ, LEVIN, COHN, FERRIS, GLOVSKY AND POPEO, P.C3580 CARMEL MOUNTAIN ROADSUITE 300SAN DIEGO, CA 92130Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Lighting apparatus, namely, artisanal lighting installations; artisanal ceiling light fittings, being artisanal electric lighting fittings, artisanal outdoor lighting fittings and artisanal indoor light fittings; artisanal lighting fixtures; artisanal lighting fixtures being indoor lighting fixtures, lighting fixtures for commercial use, lighting fixtures for household use, lighting fixtures for office use and outdoor lighting fixtures; custom pendant installations for lighting for use in bathrooms; custom pendant installations for lighting for use in kitchens; contact lighting tracks artisanal decorative electric lighting fixtures; custom pendant lighting installations; artisanal decorative electric lighting installations; artisanal lamps for lighting purposes; artisanal stands for electric lighting fixtures architectural lighting fixtures lighting installations for commercial use; artisanal outdoor lighting fixtures; artisanal bathroom lighting installations and artisanal bathroom lighting fixtures | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2025 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 10, 2025 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 24, 2025 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 24, 2025 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 10, 2025 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2024 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 20, 2024 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| May 15, 2024 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 13, 2023 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2023 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 29, 2023 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2023 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2023 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2023 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2022 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| May 18, 2022 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| May 16, 2022 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2022 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 24, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 4, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |