USPTO serial 90210281
SCHWING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCHWING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Taylor Mill, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott P. Zimmerman
SCOTT P. ZIMMERMAN SCOTT P. ZIMMERMAN, PLLCP.O. BOX 3822CARY, NC 27519UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Chicken wing sauce; Sauce mixes; Sauces; Sauces for barbecued meat; Alfredo sauce; Artichoke sauce; Barbecue sauce; Barbeque sauce; Brown sauce; Caramel sauce; Cheese sauce; Chili sauce; Chimichurri sauce; Chinese mabo tofu sauce; Chocolate sauce; Cocktail sauces; Condiment, namely, oyster sauce; Condiment, namely, pepper sauce; Cooking sauces; Cranberry sauce; Curry sauce; Dipping sauces; Duck sauce; Fish sauce; Fruit sauces; Garlic-based sauces; Grilling sauces; Habanero sauce; Hollandaise sauce; Honey mustard sauce; Hot sauce; Hot chili pepper sauce; Jerk sauce; Kombu soy sauce; Mint sauce; Mix for making combined noodle and sauce dish; Noodles and sauce mixes combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, and processed vegetables combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, and seasoning toppings combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, and topping combined in unitary packages; Noodles, sauce, dehydrated vegetables, and topping combined in unitary packages; Organic curry sauces; Oyster sauce; Pasta sauce; Peanut sauce; Pesto sauce; Picante sauce; Pico de Gallo sauce; Pizza sauce; Ready-made sauces; Salad sauces; Salsa sauces; Savory sauces used as condiments; Seasoned soy sauce (Chiyou); Shrimp sauce; Sloppy Joe Sauce; Soy sauce; Soy sauce; Spaghetti sauce; Sriracha hot chili sauce; Steak sauce; Sweet and sour sauce; Taco sauce; Tartar sauce; Teriyaki sauce; Tomato sauce; Tomato-based sauces; Worcestershire sauce; Chicken wing sauce; Condiment sauce | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |