USPTO serial 90210378
SCHWINGZZZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HOFFMAN, DAVID AARON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SCHWINGZZZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Taylor Mill, KY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott P. Zimmerman
SCOTT P. ZIMMERMAN SCOTT P. ZIMMERMAN, PLLCP.O. BOX 3822CARY, NC 27519UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Chicken; Poultry; Chicken wings; Chicken and dumplings; Chicken balls; Chicken croquettes; Chicken legs; Chicken mousse; Chicken nuggets; Chicken salad; Chicken stock; Poultry and game; Poultry substitutes; Poultry, namely, chicken; Poultry, not live; Boneless skinless chicken tenderloin; Confit in the nature of a cooked poultry based spread; Cooked dish consisting primarily of chicken and ginseng (samgyetang); Cooked dish consisting primarily of stir-fried chicken and fermented hot pepper paste (dak-galbi); Extracts of poultry; Fresh poultry; Frozen chicken, namely, chicken; Frozen appetizers consisting primarily of chicken or seafood; Marinated poultry and seafood; Marranitas, namely, green plantain shaped into balls filled with fried potatoes, chicken, beef or shrimp; Meat jerky, namely, chicken; Meat, poultry and game; Meat, fish, poultry and game preserves; Meat, fish, poultry and game, not live; Pre-packaged dinners consisting of poultry; Prepared and prepackaged meals and entrees consisting primarily of egg with one or more of meat, fish, poultry, vegetable, cheese or onion; Prepared food kits composed of meat, poultry, fish, seafood, and/or vegetables and also including sauces or seasonings, ready for cooking and assembly as a meal; Processed poultry; Seasoned poultry and seafood; Toddler meals, namely, prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; Prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; Prepared meals consisting primarily of meat, fish, poultry or vegetables; Chicken croquettes | ACTIVE | Jan 1, 2014 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 7, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 16, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 29, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |