USPTO serial 90213328
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Roger N. Behle, Jr.
Roger N. Behle, Jr. FOLEY BEZEK BEHLE & CURTIS, LLP575 ANTON BOULEVARD, #710COSTA MESA, CA 92626UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Air conditioning ducts as structural parts of vehicles; Air flow spoilers for vehicles; Airbags for vehicles; Arm rests for vehicles; Automobile bodies; Automobile bumper guards; Automobile bumpers; Automobile chains; Automobile chassis; Automobile dashboards; Automobile door handles; Automobile engines; Automobile gear shifters; Automobile gear sticks; Automobile hoods; Automobile roof racks; Automobile seat cushions; Automobile snow socks; Automobile spare wheel holders; Automobile structural parts for racing purposes, namely, fuel storage cells; Automobile structural parts for racing purposes, namely, fuel storage systems and component parts; Automobile sunroofs; Automobile suspension devices, namely, coilovers; Automobile suspension system components, namely, spring perches; Automobile tires; Automobile wheel shields; Automobile windshield sunshades; Automobile windshields; Automobiles; Automobiles and structural parts therefor; Automotive engine mounts; Automotive hood ornaments; Automotive interior paneling; Automotive interior trim; Brake systems for vehicles; Car-top luggage carriers; Cargo carriers for vehicles; Cars; Chassis for motor vehicles; Clutches for land vehicles; Disc brake pads for vehicles; Disc brakes for land vehicles; Door panels for land vehicles; Doors for automobiles; Drive shafts for land vehicles; Driving chains for land vehicles; Driving motors for land vehicles; Engine mounts for land vehicles; Engines for land vehicles; Fuel lines for vehicles; Gas tanks for land vehicles; Gearboxes; Glass windows for vehicles; Head rests for seats for motor cars; Hood shields as structural parts of vehicles; Horns for motor cars; License plate frames; Luggage carriers for automobiles; Luggage nets for vehicles; Motor car doors; Motor car seats; Motor car windows; Motor cars; Motors and engines for land vehicles; Motors for automobiles; Mud flaps for vehicles; Mudguards; Racing cars; Rearview mirrors for automobiles; Rims for vehicle wheels; Safety belts for vehicle seats; Seat belts for use in vehicles; Seats for automobiles; Shock absorbers for automobiles; Side view mirrors for vehicles; Sports cars; Steering wheel covers for automobiles; Steering wheels for automobiles; Structural parts for automobiles; Suspension systems for automobiles; Tires; Transmissions for land vehicles; Vehicle bodies; Vehicle brake discs; Vehicle brake pads; Vehicle bumpers; Vehicle chassis; Vehicle fuel tanks; Vehicle head rest covers; Vehicle hoods; Vehicle parts, namely, shock absorbers; Vehicle parts, namely, steering wheels; Vehicle seat cushions; Vehicle seats; Vehicle wheels; Wheel rims; Wheels for automobiles | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 25, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2022 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 4, 2022 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 16, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 16, 2021 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 11, 2021 | NREV | NOTICE OF REVIVAL - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2021 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2021 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 10, 2021 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 10, 2021 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 9, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 18, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 18, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 17, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |