USPTO serial 90214480
CASTANO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCDORMAN, ROGER THOMAS
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CASTANO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Ganzhou City, Jiangxi, CN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jonathan G. Morton
LONG HUA6-3A1005,YI CHENG ZHONG XIN,SHENZHEN, GUANGDONG, 518000Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 011 | Bathtubs; Faucets; Air conditioning units; Air fryers; Air humidifying apparatus; Air purifiers; Bread baking machines; Desk lamps; Dispensing units for room deodorants; Folding portable charcoal, propane and gas fired barbecues, stoves, and grills; Hair dryers; LED lamps; Light bulbs; Light Emitting Diode (LED) plant grow light; Lights for vehicles; Mechanized livestock waterers; Portable electric fans; Range hoods; Reading lights; Refrigerating or freezing showcases; Steam facial apparatus; String lights for festive decoration; Ultraviolet gel manicure lights; USB-powered hand warmers; Water fountains; Electric fans; Electric toasters | ACTIVE | Sep 2, 2020 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 2, 2022 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 2, 2022 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | RDX3 | NOTIFICATION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | RDX1 | ACTION FOR REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 21, 2021 | RRDX | ACTION REQ FOR RECON DENIED NO APPEAL FILED COUNTED NOT MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 22, 2021 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Apr 15, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 15, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 25, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 26, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 26, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 25, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Sep 30, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |