Drawing for DESKTOP COMPANION

USPTO serial 90216918

DESKTOP COMPANION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DESKTOP COMPANION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Bharati Bakshani

Bharati Bakshani LADAS & PARRY LLP1040 AVENUE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10018UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042Technological research in the field of computer hardware and computer software; Industrial design; Packaging design; Dress designing; Computer software design; Consultancy in the design and development of computer hardware; Rental of computer software; Maintenance of computer software; Providing search engines for the internet; Web site design consultancy; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for uploading images, graphics, fonts, photographs, text, videos and data; Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for creating, downloading, uploading, designing, modifying, reproducing, transmitting, discovering and sharing images, graphics, fonts, photographs, text, videos and data; Providing web-based on-line non-downloadable software for creating, downloading, uploading, designing, modifying, reproducing, transmitting, discovering and sharing images, graphics, fonts, photographs, text, videos and data; Consulting in the field of information technology; Graphic design servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2022MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2022ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 6, 2021NOAMNOA E-MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 11, 2021NPUBOFFICIAL GAZETTE PUBLICATION CONFIRMATION E-MAILED—
May 11, 2021PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 21, 2021NONPNOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF PUBLICATION E-MAILED—
Apr 8, 2021CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 7, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 6, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 6, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 1, 2021GPRNNOTIFICATION OF PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 1, 2021GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Mar 1, 2021CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Feb 19, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 12, 2020TAEATEAS AMENDMENT ENTERED BEFORE ATTORNEY ASSIGNED—
Oct 12, 2020PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 1, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance