Drawing for TIGERFISH

USPTO serial 90217044

TIGERFISH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GERMICK JR., EDWARD JOSEPH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with TIGERFISH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

J. Nevin Shaffer, Jr.

J. Nevin Shaffer, Jr. J. NEVIN SHAFFER, JR., P.A.913 GULF BREEZE PARKWAYSUITE 43GULF BREEZE, FL 32561

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
011Cleansing/sanitizing system comprising a containment enclosure specially adapted for containing an atomized cleansing/sanitizing spray mechanism for use in the cleansing/sanitizing of objects including articles of manufacture, natural products, foods and pharmaceuticalsACTIVEAug 16, 2020

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 2, 2021MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 2, 2021ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 1, 2021EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2021GNFNNOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED—
Aug 25, 2021GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 25, 2021CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 21, 2021TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 21, 2021CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 20, 2021ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 30, 2021TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 26, 2021GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2021GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 26, 2021CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 19, 2021DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2020NWOSNEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED—
Oct 1, 2020NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance