USPTO serial 90226550
PROPEL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KHAN, AHSEN M
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with PROPEL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WADE R. ORR
Wade R. Orr LUEDEKA NEELY GROUP, P.C.P.O. BOX 1871KNOXVILLE, TN 37901UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Software as a service (SAAS) services featuring software for generating mortgage loan documents for mortgage lenders based on data obtained from the mortgage lender which includes at least in part data provided to the lender by the borrower(s), namely, software for receiving a mortgage loan data set from a lender for a particular loan and loan type, performing audit checks of the received data set to verify compliance with applicable national, state, and local regulations and standards for the particular loan type, informing the lender of missing or erroneous data, and generating mortgage loan documents that meet and comply with the applicable regulations and standards for the particular loan type ultimately for delivery by the lender to the borrower(s), the foregoing SAAS services used exclusively by mortgage lenders prior to the closing process of a mortgage loan | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 6, 2022 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 5, 2022 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 26, 2022 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | GEA1 | NOTIFICATION OF ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 15, 2022 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 14, 2022 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 5, 2022 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2022 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2022 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 2, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 2, 2021 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 26, 2021 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 27, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 26, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 24, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |