USPTO serial 90227815
GOLDEN HORN EXPERT IN HANDCRAFT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CROWLEY, SEAN MICHAEL
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with GOLDEN HORN EXPERT IN HANDCRAFT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
NORTH BRUNSWICK, NJ
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Cases of leather or leatherboard; Cases of imitation leather; Leather cases; Leather cases for keys; Leather straps; Leather; Leather and imitation leather; Leather and imitation leather bags; Leather and imitation leather sport bags and general purpose trolley bags; Leather bags; Leather bags and wallets; Leather bags for merchandise packaging; Leather bags, suitcases and wallets; Leather binders for travel purposes; Leather boxes; Leather boxes for storing greeting cards; Leather briefcases; Leather cord; Leather credit card holder; Leather credit card cases; Leather credit card wallets; Leather for furniture; Leather for harnesses; Leather for shoes; Leather handbags; Leather key cases; Leather leads; Leather leashes; Leather luggage tags; Leather or leather-board boxes; Leather pouches; Leather purses; Leather shopping bags; Leather shoulder straps; Leather shoulder belts; Leather sold in bulk; Leather thongs for fastening or securing items; Leather travelling bag sets; Leather trimmings for furniture; Leather, unwrought or semi-wrought; Wallets made of leather or other materials; All-purpose leather straps; Attache cases made of leather; Attache cases made of imitation leather; Bags of leather for packaging; Boxes of leather or leatherboard; Briefcase-type leather business folders; Chamois leather, other than for cleaning purposes; Envelopes, of leather, for packaging; Garment bags for travel made of leather; Girths of leather; Hat boxes of leather; Imitation leather; Imitation leather sold in bulk; Industrial packaging containers of leather; Key cases; Key cases of leather or imitation leather; Key-cases of leather and skins; Labels of leather; Pet accessories, namely, canvas, vinyl and leather pouches for holding disposable bags to place pet waste in; Pet accessories, namely, specially designed canvas, vinyl or leather bags attached to animal leashes for holding small items such as keys, credit cards, money or disposable bags for disposing of pet waste; Polyurethane leather; Pouches made from imitation leather; Pouches of leather; Pouches, of leather, for packaging; Saddlery of leather; Tanned leather; Thongs of leather or hide for fastening or securing items; Travelling cases of leather; Trimmings of leather for furniture; Worked or semi-worked hides and other leather | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 2, 2022 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE E-MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 2, 2022 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNFN | NOTIFICATION OF FINAL REFUSAL EMAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2021 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 18, 2021 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 20, 2021 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 19, 2021 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 2, 2021 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2021 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 2, 2021 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 23, 2021 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2020 | MDSM | NOTICE OF DESIGN SEARCH CODE E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2020 | NWOS | NEW APPLICATION OFFICE SUPPLIED DATA ENTERED | — |
| Oct 3, 2020 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |